Category: Case Studies

Build Bridges of Understanding – Part 2

mcalisterts 0 Comment Case Studies, Collaboration, Expert Advice, Food Safety, Management Skills, Uncategorized , , , , , , ,

Find the Answer - Magnifying Glass

 

 

 

 

Building Bridges Part 1 addressed how to gather useful information by having honest conversations with the people involved in the issue. Gathering as much information as possible was the key to determining exactly what happened. However, fact gathering is only a part of the process; it is equally important to implement improvements based on the information.

The highest levels of performance come to people who are centered, intuitive, creative, and reflective – people who know to see a problem as an opportunity. – Deepak Chopra

Here was the journey we took to solve the problem described in Part 1.

Once we gathered the preliminary information, we decided that the issue was most likely related to the raw material handling process. As we dug into the details of how the raw materials were handled we started asking questions such as, “how could one raw material be introduced into another raw material?”

We then discussed scenarios in which the offending material might have been introduced into a ‘common’ raw material, and developed one such scenario:

Contamination may occur when an offending allergen (seafood) attached itself to a common ingredient (pasta) because it was unsuccessfully separated out during the ‘re-work’ process (used to reclaim raw materials from damaged packages). When the ‘contaminated’ pasta was used again, it was used as raw material for a product that didn’t contain seafood. Thus, the process for re-using raw materials from damaged packages would have created the situation where unwanted ingredients were inadvertently mixed into the raw material.

As we talked through this scenario, we realized that a process intended to avoid wasting materials, actually put the product at risk. Armed with this information, we were able to determine the most likely root cause for the issue.

We were now presented with the ‘opportunity’ to eliminate the potential for contamination. This would involve changes in the material handling procedures and a commitment to a training program for the workers who manage the tracking paperwork. The owner of the business was amenable to the changes; peace of mind about the safety of his products was well worth any additional expense. The changes were effective. Millions of packages were consumed over the next 15 years without incident.

To summarize, here’s the entire process:

  1. Open up an honest and in-depth discussion about the situation and ensure everyone involved is on the same page. Establish the goal of the discussion and keep it in mind the entire time.
  2. As the discussion leads to various possible scenarios that could explain what occurred, critically and thoroughly review the scenarios – the smallest detail can lead to the smoking gun.
  3. Once the root cause is determined and verified, develop ‘fool-proof’ procedures to ensure the issue cannot re-occur. These new procedures must be audited to ensure they truly eliminate the potential issue.
  4. Discuss the rationale for making procedural changes with the production workers and supervision. Let them know why it is so important to follow the new procedures and how they can help keep the product safe.

I have always believed that “all of us are smarter than one of us”. In the end, because my team had the trust of the owner and his team, we were able to resolve the issue together.

To boil it down: focus on getting accurate, detailed information at the beginning of the process. Once the information is gathered, let your intuition guide you toward the next steps, such as brainstorming about scenarios. Once logical opportunities are presented, go out and test them. You will find out quickly if the situation can be recreated. Lastly, work out new procedures or policies that will effectively eliminate the problem.

Successful problem-solving starts with building bridges of understanding. Mr. Carnegie put it into words over 75 years ago and his words ring true today.

 

Photo credit: depositphotos.com 21849021 by:iqoncept

[contact-form][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Website’ type=’url’/][contact-field label=’Comment’ type=’textarea’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]

Build Bridges of Understanding – Part 1

mcalisterts 0 Comment Case Studies, Collaboration, Expert Advice, Food Safety, Management Skills , , , , ,

Person on bridge helping another

 

 

 

 

Investigating major quality problems can be a difficult task. I think I speak for most workers; people don’t like to ‘get in trouble’, especially on the job. Whether negligence is involved or not, gathering useful information can be a challenge. However, in order to correct the situation and prevent it from happening again, it is extremely important to determine exactly what happened.

In my experience, the success of an investigation usually depends upon the investigator’s ability to put workers at ease. This helps the process to move quickly and thoroughly, resulting in accurate identification of the problems and rapid resolution.

Dale Carnegie recommends listening first, particularly in a tense situation.

“Let them finish. Do not resist, defend or debate. This only raises barriers. Try to build bridges of understanding. Dale Carnegie – Goodreads.com link

When trying to solve a serious problem, getting the full story with as much detail as possible is very important. Channeling Mr. Carnegie’s term, always attempt to “…build bridges of understanding”.

The three steps below are useful in the initial stages of the investigation

  1. Preface the discussions with the people involved
    • Let the interviewee know that all information is helpful toward resolving the issue completely.
    • Help them understand they are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
    • Make the discussion as non-emotional as possible. Let the person being interviewed know that the discussion is strictly intended for gathering facts and not meant to find someone to blame for the issue.
    • Mention that it is very seldom a single act or situation that caused the problem and their input is needed to be able to assemble the ‘pieces of the puzzle’ to resolve the issue once and for all.
  2. Establish the timeline based on facts
    • When did the situation occur?
    • What equipment or process was involved?
    • Explore any unusual circumstances taking place at the time of the incident.
    • Who else would have been in the area when the problem occurred that could add more information?
    • If the interview process uncovers multiple sources of the problem, collate all of the information into a single timeline listing all of the discrete times, places, and people involved in the issue.
  3. Once the basic causes are worked out set up a meeting with the appropriate personnel to perform a root cause analysis (to be discussed in Part 2).

Over 15 years ago I had a situation where I used the steps above to gather critical information necessary to resolve a complicated quality issue. A third party manufactured a finished product for our company and unfortunately the product was contaminated with an undeclared allergen. This was an extremely dangerous situation for someone who was highly allergic to the material, and a nationwide recall was performed. Thankfully nobody was ever injured as a result of this issue.

Immediately after the discovery of the problem (and a separate team had quickly initiated the recall), I was sent to the manufacturer to determine what happened and implement new procedures to prevent it from happening again. From the very beginning it was clear that this investigation was going to be challenging. From a practical perspective it was going to be costly; the situation would most likely result in a major insurance settlement (best case) or a significant legal proceeding (worst case).

The first thing I did was schedule a meeting with the owner at the company. The purpose of the meeting was to lay out the intent of my visit and the expected outcomes. In this case, it seemed straight-forward: determine exactly what happened and establish new procedures that would prevent it from happening again. I made it clear that my focus was on determining the root cause without assigning blame. I also made it clear that the information gathered during the investigation would be shared with the owner prior to communicating it to my management. I wanted the owner to agree that the information being communicated was factual and unbiased before it was distributed to anyone else.

I believe by establishing these ‘ground rules’ up front, it helped the owner to feel more comfortable disclosing all of the facts. He also encouraged his employees to fully cooperate in the investigation by saying that all information would be important in resolving the issue.

The interview process took place and a comprehensive timeline was developed. With this information we were able to initiate a successful root cause analysis and determine exactly how the product was contaminated. I will describe the root cause analysis process and ultimate resolution to the problem in Part 2.

Establishing open communication, ground rules, and transparency at the start, was key to expediting a successful investigation. This enabled us to ‘build bridges of understanding’.

Look to Part 2 for the results of the interviews, the root cause process and how we worked together to correct the situation permanently.

 

Photo credit: Depositphotos.com Image 11826066 by 6kor3dos

Are You Painting a Clear Picture?

mcalisterts 0 Comment Business Forecast, Case Studies, Expert Advice, Uncategorized , , , ,

Woman standing in the gallery

As my department worked through a crisis several years back, I discovered that the information we needed was not available in a format that would help us resolve the issues. Due to the nature of the crisis, and the need to communicate information inside the company and to our customers, I found a way to assemble a large amount of data into a single, concise communication that made sense to everyone, not just supply chain people.

“Every now and then one paints a picture that seems to have opened a door and serves as a stepping stone to other things.” ― Pablo Picasso

I have a feeling that Picasso wasn’t thinking about customer service when he said this, but I like his sentiment. If painting ‘pictures’ can serve as stepping-stones, then they can help us move on to bigger and better things.

I was the Supply Chain manager when a production issue necessitated a massive recall for half of the existing inventory in my category. The production network was running at 100% capacity when the problem occurred so we all knew it would take time to recover. The million dollar question (literally) was how long would the situation affect our customers? A few weeks? Several months? As you might imagine, our customers were not going to accept an answer of ‘we aren’t sure when you will get your product.’ I asked my planner for a report that would show the weekly inventory position for every item for the next 13 weeks, and I was told the planning system was not able to generate such a comprehensive view.

Since a problem of this size was new for me, I asked my compatriots for examples of how to manage such a major problem. Unfortunately, I was only greeted with kind words of support. It turned out that nobody on the staff had dealt with a problem this large before and no template was available.

It was clear that we needed to develop a method for communicating the status of the inventory, and here are the steps my team and I took to ‘paint a picture’ that would generate useful information for Management and ultimately our customers.

  1. Determine what information is available from the planning system, and how to download it into a spreadsheet.
  • Weekly production plans were available in the supply planning system, however a complete view of the inventory position was not available in a single report. This was a quirk of the system, and getting individual items to aggregate into a single report was something I.T. was not willing to tackle, regardless of the circumstances.
  • We found that the individual item information could be downloaded from the planning system, however, this report included raw data showing the current inventory and planned production quantities along with other pieces of extraneous data. Using an ‘intermediate’ spreadsheet, we extracted and formatted the information needed for the next step.
  1. Once the data is in a spreadsheet, determine how to format the information to accurately tell the story
  • Within our company, most people understood the inventory position in terms of ‘days of coverage’. For the purposes of communication, we needed to put several of the items on a single page, to see the overall effect of the production plan. The most accurate way to calculate the inventory coverage was to develop a formula that used 1) the inventory available at the beginning of the week, 2) the production plan, and 3) the demand forecast, in order to calculate the theoretical days of coverage in the inventory each week going forward.
  • Once the formulae were set up to calculate days of supply for the next 13 weeks, we determined it would be helpful to color-code the information to generate a way to identify issues more easily. This is where the ‘stop-light’ formatting for each cell was used; with green being considered ‘good’ inventory levels, yellow considered ‘risky’ or potentially problematic, and red being ‘bad’ or definite customer service problems. We also used blue to indicate if the inventory was above target.
  1. Develop a view that provides information for driving decision-making.
  • Once the data was verified and the color-coding applied, we assembled a view to show the ‘days of supply’ for all items for the upcoming 13 weeks. It indicated that it would take over two months for the inventory to completely recover. (The chart below is a simulation of the initial inventory positions we discovered. It does not use the actual data.)
  • With the inventory projection view finally in place, we could discuss various production options, such as delaying the production of less popular (slower moving) items, and risking some case fill issues, while producing larger volumes of the more popular items. A few scenarios were presented to management for their review and decisions were made regarding the information to be shared with customers. Now we could show our customers when they could expect the product back on their shelves.

Mock DOH Chart 121514

Prior to developing this methodology, we were making educated guesses about the timing of the recovery. For the most part, these guesses were inaccurate, frustrating management and our customers alike. Having much more accurate and comprehensive days of supply information available was extremely helpful to the Sales team and our customers. Armed with this information customers could find ways to work around the gaps on their shelves.

At the end of the day, a clear picture of bad news was better than not knowing when customer service would recover. With a chart like the one above, we were able to have meaningful and honest discussions with our customers. Sharing accurate information, even if it is not good news, is the key to building trust between organizations.

Picasso was certainly correct about a picture serving as a stepping-stone. We found a way to move forward with our customers once we generated a clear picture of the situation.

 

Photo credit: depositphotos.com image:26852525 by: semisatch

Water Chestnuts Only Come from China? Really?

mcalisterts 0 Comment Case Studies, Expert Advice, Management Skills, Preparedness , , , , ,

Depositphotos_53476899_xs

“There’s no harm in hoping for the best as long as you’re prepared for the worst.” Stephen King, Different Seasons

Although Mr. King is not known for his supply chain expertise, he could have written a thriller based on a situation that took place in our supply chain a number of years ago.

About a month after our company had launched a new product line using water chestnuts, we immediately saw signs of sales exceeding the forecast. After confirming this with Sales, I performed analysis on the raw material inventory to determine if we were at risk. It had already been a long day when my spreadsheet revealed that we would run out of water chestnuts in less than 6 weeks. I gave Procurement a quick call to let them know we would need to move up a shipment or two.

After a few minutes of discussion with Procurement, what I learned was a little shocking: the supplier was in China and they didn’t have any ‘safety stock’ in the US. This meant that there wasn’t any extra material readily available and we were likely to run out of material before the next shipment.

Unfortunately, it got worse. Digging further, we determined that the amount ordered and in-transit was not going to be enough to cover the rapidly rising requirements. We needed to ship incremental material quickly or we would jeopardize the product launch. This situation emphasized one of the unwritten rules of planning: If you are about to run out of a material, demand for the product will invariably increase.

My next question for Procurement was about an alternative supplier that could cover the potential shortage. After an uncomfortable pause on the phone, my contact said, “Water chestnuts are only sourced out of China, and because of our unique specifications, the supplier is the sole source of supply for the material we need for our product.” Really?

Rosemary Coates’ ‘The Risk of Failure.’  addresses rising supply chain risk due to materials being routinely sourced from far-reaching geographies. Speaking from experience, the risk is very real.

If we had to do it over again, we would certainly do things differently. It is the business team’s prerogative to ‘assemble’ the best product they can with the materials at their disposal. It can always be debated whether a unique material is ‘necessary’ to make a desirable product, but this discussion will focus on a proactive approach to managing long lead-time materials.

“Prepare for the unknown by studying how others in the past have coped with the unforeseeable and the unpredictable.” Gen. George S. Patton

There were a few days that felt like we were in the Battle of Bulge along with General Patton. In other circumstances it would be good news that sales of the product line were exceeding the forecast, but in this case, the supply chain was raising flags saying we may experience a shortage of water chestnuts (among other ingredients) making it difficult to produce some of the items. Putting it mildly, this is not what the business team wanted to hear.

Based on the trials and tribulations we experienced as we worked out the situation, here are three broad areas to consider when sourcing unique materials from distant geographies:

  1. Carefully estimate the transit time and the time it takes to move items through Customs. What is the typical shipping time? Does it take 3 weeks or more to get across the ocean? How long does it take to get through Customs. Does your company have experience clearing materials through Customs. How long does it take to transport the material from the entry port to your location? Hiring an experienced import resource to manage the paperwork at the port and subsequent transactions can be very helpful. For this particular item, we allowed 6 weeks from the time the boat left the port in China until the material was in our facility ready for use.
  2. Understand the vendor’s options if their primary source is depleted or the demand outpaces the rate of supply. Does the vendor have an alternative supplier or additional production capacity? If the demand for the material unexpectedly doubles or triples, can the vendor keep up? If not, what are the alternatives? Will a slightly different material work for short periods of time? Knowing the answers to these questions prior to being in a panic situation can be very helpful.
  3. Develop a conservative inventory policy for high-risk materials. A conservative policy in this context means ‘extra’ inventory. Obviously it is necessary to be fiscally responsible, however the risk of suffering customer service issues (no product available) must be weighed against making sure 3-4 months of inventory is always available in a local warehouse. A key to making this plan work is requiring the vendor to have ‘safety stock’ readily available at all times. It is extremely important to ensure this agreement is being upheld and the inventory confirmed on a frequent basis. Having this stock locally available (in country) on short notice can greatly improve the chances for success of a product launch.

Perhaps you are wondering how our ‘thrilling’ situation worked out. We had to air-freight some of the material from China to the US. Suffice it to say this was very costly. From the beginning of the product launch, our customers were extremely excited to have the product on their shelves. The initial success of the product line led the business team to justify the expense.

After this incident, one of the activities that proved to be helpful was setting aside a day to conduct what we called ‘War Games’. The idea behind this activity was to get all of the key players (Sales, Marketing, Procurement, Planning, Quality, etc.) in one room for a day to go through all of the possible issues that could jeopardize the launch of a product. This brainstorming session would take place soon after Management decided to launch a new product and everyone had a chance to discuss possible upcoming challenges to the new business. All aspects are discussed, including competitive market challenges, distribution problems, supply chain concerns (such as the one discussed here) and any other concerns the team may uncover.

Planning conservative raw material inventories can make a significant difference in ensuring product is available during the critical stages of a product launch. Turning Mr. King’s quote around, “Preparing for the worst will let us hope for the best.”

 

Photo credit: Depositphotos.com 53476899 thinglass